Product · Cyber Risk Assessment

SecureStart™

Independent Cyber Risk Assessment

In brief

SecureStart™ is a fixed-scope, independently delivered cyber risk assessment from Cyber Defense Advisors. In three weeks and about six hours of client time, it rates all 106 NIST CSF 2.0 subcategories, quantifies exposure in dollars using FAIR, and delivers a costed remediation roadmap and an executive readout.

SecureStart is a fixed-scope, independently delivered cyber risk assessment that tells an executive team three things in three weeks: where the program actually stands against NIST CSF 2.0, what the exposure is worth in dollars, and what to fix first.

It is scoped for companies that need a defensible answer fast — for an insurance renewal, a customer questionnaire, a board that has started asking — without committing to a multi-month engagement. Roughly six hours of client time, start to readout.

Who buys it

  • CEO and COO
  • CISO, CIO and CTO
  • Chief Risk Officer
  • General Counsel
  • Compliance Officer
  • Audit committee and board
  • PE operating partners
kickoff to executive readout
3 weeks
of client time, start to finish
~6 hours
NIST CSF 2.0 subcategories rated
106

Scope

What gets assessed

All 106 subcategories of NIST CSF 2.0, rated on a six-level CMMI-aligned maturity scale, across the six Framework Functions.

  • Govern

    Strategy, roles, policy, oversight, and how cyber risk reaches the board.

  • Identify

    Asset and data inventory, business environment, risk assessment practice, supplier risk.

  • Protect

    Identity and access, awareness, data security, platform security, resilience of technology.

  • Detect

    Monitoring coverage, logging, alerting, and how anomalies are actually adjudicated.

  • Respond

    Incident response plan, roles, communications, analysis, mitigation, lessons learned.

  • Recover

    Recovery planning, execution, and communications — tested against real scenarios.

Deliverables

What you receive

  • Maturity scorecard

    All 106 NIST CSF 2.0 subcategories rated, with current and target state.

  • Quantified exposure model

    Annualized loss exposure using FAIR, so risk is stated in dollars.

  • Costed remediation roadmap

    Phased, sequenced, with effort and investment attached to each item.

  • Executive readout

    A 60-minute session for the leadership team and, where asked, the board.

  • Board-ready summary

    A short narrative a non-technical director can read and act on.

Delivery approach

How it's delivered

  1. Discovery

    Kickoff, scoping confirmation, document request, stakeholder scheduling.

    Days 1–3

  2. Assessment

    Structured interviews and evidence review across all six Functions.

    Days 4–10

  3. Analysis

    Maturity scoring, FAIR modeling, prioritization and roadmap costing.

    Days 11–15

  4. Reporting

    Report build, internal QA, named-assessor sign-off, executive readout.

    Days 16–21

  5. Ongoing advisory

    Optional remediation oversight, re-assessment, or fractional security leadership.

    Elective

Timeline. Three weeks from kickoff to executive readout. Approximately six hours of client time.

Standards and methods applied

Standard / authorityApplied to
NIST CSF 2.0Assessment spine — all 106 subcategories across the six Functions
CMMI-aligned maturity modelSix-level scoring, so progress is measurable year over year
FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk)Annualized loss exposure and scenario modeling
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5Control reference for remediation design
ISO/IEC 27001:2022Crosswalk for clients heading toward certification
ISO 31000:2018Risk criteria, scoring and treatment discipline

Responsible AI

Where AI is used — and where it is not

  • Evidence and document review is AI-accelerated: policies, prior audits, configuration exports and questionnaire responses are parsed and mapped to CSF subcategories in a fraction of manual review time.
  • Control mapping and crosswalking to 800-53, ISO 27001 and client frameworks is model-assisted, then assessor-verified.
  • Narrative drafting and roadmap costing are accelerated so more of the engagement budget goes to analysis.

Every rating, every dollar figure and every recommendation is reviewed and signed by a named CDA assessor. AI does not score, and it does not sign.

Why CDA

Why SecureStart™ from CDA

  • Independent by construction

    The assessment is independent of anything else CDA offers. Findings are never steered toward a product or service. The finding is the finding.

  • Quantified, not color-coded

    FAIR loss modeling turns a heat map into a number a CFO can weigh against the cost of fixing it.

  • A named assessor, not a platform

    A senior practitioner owns the engagement and signs the report. Scanning tools and SaaS dashboards do not produce a defensible opinion.

  • Built to be handed on

    The client owns the report and the roadmap and may take either to any provider, including a competitor.

Ideal client profile

Companies from roughly 50 to 1,000 employees in regulated or contract-driven sectors — financial services, healthcare, insurance, legal, construction and AEC, manufacturing, professional services, and PE portfolio companies — that have IT leadership but no full-time security executive.

Scope, guardrails and responsible AI

Non-invasive and evidence-based; intrusive testing requires separate written authorization. Evidence is held under NDA in CDA's environment. AI-assisted analysis is reviewed and signed by a named CDA assessor; client data is not used to train external models. Not a certification or audit opinion.

Download the SecureStart™ product sheet (PDF)

Fixed-fee, scoped to your environment · 833-54-CYBER (833-542-9237)

Scope SecureStart™ with us